You obviously never knew anyone that was in so much pain and the drugs given them to help fight that pain made them even more ill, and then seen the difference a small amount of cannabis can make. I can see your argument for recreational use, not that I totally agree, but medicinal? Do your really think opioids are better? Since they are the most prescribed.I am against the use of marijuana for medical and recreational use. It has no life saving properties, it distorts perceptions, impairs judgement, slows reaction times and impedes motor control.
Cannabinoids and their metabolites are cumulative in human tissues and heavy use renders detection possible for months. It is not reaching to assume that when this drug is detectable in urinalysis or blood plasma, it is still rendering some degree of impairment to the perceptions, reaction time and motor control of the drug user.
The quality of almost any employable task is subject to performance impairment or to present a danger to the public when the employed are under the influence of cannabinol. There is no need to list them all, or to describe all the negative implications. Consider a simple list of employment activities with associated negative consequences intuitively impied: hand washing, hand washing techniques in food preparation and service; law enforcement, surgery, or aviation. Any of this should give us reason to pause before lending our support for marijuana legalization.
This is my opinion and it is not subject to change.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk