Agree entirely. If Trump is as smart as he seems he should jump in front and lead the legalization parade. That would totally cook the demonrats goose in 2020. Not that they haven’t managed to cook it themselves with all their commie idiot candidates on display but as the conservation officer said as he peed in the River, “Every little bit helps.”There's enough people on both sides that feel it should be legalized (whether they use it or not) that this shouldn't be a deciding vote. It's going to be legalized eventually anyway and we're spending million to fight something less dangerous than alcohol, so why fight it? For the sake of individual freedom, it should be legalized.
If repubs were smart, they'd take the fight away from the Dems.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
True, but the likelihood of that happening is infinitesimal.The government shouldn’t be involved in what adults put in there bodies until it effects someone else. Just from a liberty point of view, If you believe in the individual it should be easy to see that.
That is because of the mass quantities of stoners moving to those areas to be involved in the trade. Most end up homeless. If it is 50 state legal there shouldn't be any hippy movements flooding a single area. Well except Austin.Touchy subject. Although I believe it should be decriminalized I do believe it should be restricted. Hearing from people what has happened in areas where it has been legalized hasn't been encouraging. Communities where it has been legalized are often characterized as shitholes compared to what they once were.
That is because of the mass quantities of stoners moving to those areas to be involved in the trade. Most end up homeless. If it is 50 state legal there shouldn't be any hippy movements flooding a single area. Well except Austin.
Not sure there is room for any more wacky potheads in Austin. Talk to a guy occasionally from Durango, CO. He says that once quaint little town is eat up with stoners living in tents and panhandling. Universal legalization bound to help on that.maybe.That is because of the mass quantities of stoners moving to those areas to be involved in the trade. Most end up homeless. If it is 50 state legal there shouldn't be any hippy movements flooding a single area. Well except Austin.
How weird that would be.I'd be ok if every representative voted by the majority of their constituents.
Well, I'd much rather someone pass me on the highway with a MJ buzz than someone that had just drank a six-pack or more!
There's enough people on both sides that feel it should be legalized (whether they use it or not) that this shouldn't be a deciding vote. It's going to be legalized eventually anyway and we're spending million to fight something less dangerous than alcohol, so why fight it? For the sake of individual freedom, it should be legalized.
If repubs were smart, they'd take the fight away from the Dems.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Bingo!The only issue I have one way or the other is it has to be resolved at the Federal level before the state level.