Ex military with no rights..

[zenfly]

Colorado Marine Told To Get Rid of His Firearms or Find Another Home

 

[txinvestigator]

Your title and intro certainly are not in line with the facts. You make him appear singled out. This has nothing to do with him being ex military or with his rights.

 

[TreyG-20]

Yup. Still bs though. Since the landlords own the property and his renting and keeps his property their what can be done? If I were him I'd move. Since they changed the policy of his lease after he has moved in that should give him the right to get out of his contract correct?

 

[zenfly]

Your title and intro certainly are not in line with the facts. You make him appear singled out. This has nothing to do with him being ex military or with his rights.

I am a landlord..Have been for many yrs and I don't think we have any rights to over ride any Americans constitutional rights.. Our govt does this every day wiping their a$$ with our constitution..

and I don't remember posting any facts..only the title..the way it was written

 

[Renegade]

I am a landlord..Have been for many yrs and I don't think we have any rights to over ride any Americans constitutional rights..

Well it does not really matter what you think, it matters what the law allows.

 

[zenfly]

Well it does not really matter what you think, it matters what the law allows.

So few realize today that any law or portion of a law that conflicts with the constitution is rendered void.. The constitution and our 2nd is still the supreme law of the land.. Period

 

[Renegade]

So few realize today that any law or portion of a law that conflicts with the constitution is rendered void.. The constitution and our 2nd is still the supreme law of the land.. Period

So few realize today that that it is SCOTUS who decides what is and what not Constitutional, not themselves.

 

[Younggun]

Well, I share your opinion but a law isn't unconstitutional until the Supreme Court says so or people in mass choose to make sure they are heard.


Edit: Oops, too late

 

[Mexican_Hippie]

The Bill of Rights restricts the government, not property owners like landlords.

 

[txinvestigator]

So few realize today that any law or portion of a law that conflicts with the constitution is rendered void.. The constitution and our 2nd is still the supreme law of the land.. Period

So few today realize that the bill of rights limits the government, not a privately owned apartment complex.

 

[txinvestigator]

and I don't remember posting any facts..only the title..the way it was written

You posted a link to the article, then used misleading, false and inflammatory language in the title of your thread and the description of the link.

The complex has every right to control the property. His being ex military, ex marine or anything else has nothing to do with the issue. It was not just him, and it is not just guns. You cannot force your beliefs on others. Don't like the rules, cool with me. It's a free country; live somewhere else.

 

[iamsamcrawdad]

I see a large increase in crime at these apartments in the near future. dude needs to move for sure.

 

[Southpaw]

I see a large increase in crime at these apartments in the near future. dude needs to move for sure.

I've seen many leases that have a no weapons policy. This is not uncommon. Had he not said anything and made a case about it, management would have been none the wiser. If in the event that he did indeed need to use his firearm, then he could have just dealt with management after the fact.

 

[M. Sage]

I'd like to know who owns this complex, and what's in the lease. There's more to this, and I have a feeling the landlord might be overstepping.

The only no-weapons lease I've heard of was a Housing Authority on the left coast, and threat of 2A lawsuit made them remove it. Then again, that's a government agency...

 

[M. Sage]

OK, I found this:

Oakwood Apartments - Ross Management Group | Ross Management Group

Apparently it's a senior community that uses tax credits for seniors to pay their bills. That tax credit link to the government may be what the guy needs to beat this no-firearms policy... Maybe.

 

[RetArmySgt]

I have had the no weapons clause removed from my lease at an apartment complex that i lived at. If you catch it before you sign the lease its not hard to have them removed. All i had to tell the apartment manager is that if that clause was not removed i would have to have a notarized form showing her and the management company criminally and financially liable for any break in, theft or injury as a result of either. She took out a red pen crossed through the clause, initialed and had the office notary notarize the removal of the clause.

To be honest i didnt know if it was going to work but it did. And if it didnt i would have went somewhere else.

 

[rushthezeppelin]

So few realize today that that it is SCOTUS who decides what is and what not Constitutional, not themselves.

So few realize the founders never intended the SCOTUS to determine constitutionality of laws.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD

 

[Renegade]

So few realize the founders never intended the SCOTUS to determine constitutionality of laws.

+1, but that only proves my point.

So few realize The Federal Convention of 1787 was supposed to revise the Articles of Confederation, not create a new Constitution.

 

[cbigclarke]

So few realize the founders never intended the SCOTUS to determine constitutionality of laws.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD

There is no warrant in the constitution for them to

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2

 

[Southpaw]

I'd like to know who owns this complex, and what's in the lease. There's more to this, and I have a feeling the landlord might be overstepping.

The only no-weapons lease I've heard of was a Housing Authority on the left coast, and threat of 2A lawsuit made them remove it. Then again, that's a government agency...

Had one in a previous lease in SA, had them in AZ, FL, and a few other southern states, all private, non housing authority properties.


Always ignored them. No need to talk to them at all as I never felt it was their business to know that I owned firearms. IF I actually had to use a firearm in defense of my family or property, the possibility of eviction wouldn't cross my mind. More then likely I would be looking to find new residence anyway.