Mods, can we please close this before it goes full retard
sooooo they made a target of me runnin away with a white woman over my shoulder?
Yes, but it was Dianne Feinstein.
And before you saw this ....WOW just saw this. Regardless of who brought this to light and any little hypothetical scenarios, this is dumb.
As an example of the pregnant women,
I've dealt with plenty of pregnant females who are so amped up they have fought, pulled knives, thank god some of them didn't have guns. Add the hormones into that.
And all this was working as a Firefighter... With no body armor or PD on scene.
Working in a Jail too, I can say pregnant females being arrested for aggravated offenses, robbery or assaulting a peace officer aren't uncommon.
Do not discount a woman because she is pregnant.
So you advocate training in an unlikely scenario (unwarranted entry) but don't advocate it for a less likely scenario (prego / child with gun).WOW just saw this. Regardless of who brought this to light and any little hypothetical scenarios, this is dumb. "Let's practice shooting at children and pregnant woman, just in case we run across one that might point a gun at one of us". I can understand that this is possible, but most LE will not deal with an armed pregnant woman or child in their whole career. Bigjohn is right with his example, "I want targets of an entry team busting though my door without a warrant! ill bet that'd turn some heads at the range!" This would be deemed as wrong by the very same guys that want to use these ridiculous targets of civilians but that is, by far, more likely to happen. If you need to practice shooting a pregnant woman with a gun, under the excuse that you might cross it one day, you shouldn't even be on the force. You're not trained rather or not to shoot a pregnant woman or child, you're trained to return fire when you're being fired at. So, to specify who it might be, is stupid in the first place. You better get a target of a midget, paraplegic, and your own mother pointing a gun at you. Never know when and if it could happen. All arguments that support these idiotic targets, make no good points and offer no good reasons. This is flat out dumb. Stop trying to justify it with hypothetical reasoning. It's wrong, no matter how you look at it.
So you advocate training in an unlikely scenario (unwarranted entry) but don't advocate it for a less likely scenario (prego / child with gun).
It's unlikely that there will be a fire in your home so scrap the detectors, extinguishers, and the phone because you probably won't need to call the FD. Don't to teach the kids about fire drills either, they'll probably never be in a real fire.
By your logic, YOU should keep a tinfoil hat around, just in case. Never know if aliens really could invade. Rather be safe then sorry, right?
Am I the only one who saw/read MBA's posts and thought "bro, you just went full retard"? The hypocrisy is so thick you can damn near cut it with a knife and then spread it on your toast. Advocates training for all scenarios, but sees something that can make that easier/more realistic and flips his shit.
Anyway. Mind pointing out how this is wrong/pointless? Someone (I can't remember who) said a few pages back that these targets could easily be used for running different scenarios, i.e the prego could have been holding off an attacker until the cops showed up, and simply didn't feel like lowering her gun until the other bastard is in cuffs or otherwise secure/incapacitated. To me that seems like a perfectly logical use for these sort of targets (and it's pretty much what some LE organizations/departments already do, 'cept with paper targets and live rounds instead of people and paintballs).
If these targets -are- being used to desensitize, I personally don't have a problem with that, however I believe that's a fairly unlikely reason for them being used (IF, that is, they actually are being used by LE agencies).
The rest of post #71 says train for all scenarios, as long as you don't use the training procedures MBA disagrees with.
it's really easy to sit and monday morning quarterback the actions of others without ALL the facts
all we know is that DHS is potentially buying these targets
beyond that - the rationale, reason, etc etc - we havent heard a bit of it
but - form an opinion anyway......after all, it's just a piece of paper