Axxe55
Retiretgtshit stirrer
Whether anyone likes Derek Chauvin of not, is irrelevant. He wasn't on trial for how popular, or unpopular he might be, and a trial isn't a popularity contest. A case suppose to be decided upon facts and evidence that are brought forth. Personally, I don't think I would like Chauvin and probably wouldn't want to be around him for very long, but that wouldn't be the reasons for finding him not guilty.
And if this case of him "restraining" someone back in 2017 was so significant, and so important, why is it now just becoming more public? Why didn't they either fire, or prosecute him 2017?
I think it's just adding more to the already media circus we are seeing and trying to convince people that a guilty verdict was the right choice.
And if this case of him "restraining" someone back in 2017 was so significant, and so important, why is it now just becoming more public? Why didn't they either fire, or prosecute him 2017?
I think it's just adding more to the already media circus we are seeing and trying to convince people that a guilty verdict was the right choice.