Wait, so this passed the Senate more than a week ago??The other two have been going for at least a week, maybe longer.
Wait, so this passed the Senate more than a week ago??
Sent from my Pixel 4 using Tapatalk
Yes getting there.Wait, so this passed the Senate more than a week ago??
Sent from my Pixel 4 using Tapatalk
Wasn't Abbott against it originally?Passed the House, Today it passed the Senate, now it goes back to the House then onto Abbott's desk if everything is good to go.
Probably for many states.But we still have to keep chl for travel purposes right?
But we still have to keep chl for travel purposes right?
Take from this what you will:
EXCLUSIVE: TX Gun Rights Says Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick Added 'Poison Pill' to Constitutional Carry Bill
"It looks like Patrick may have successfully placed a poison pill in an amendment to Constitutional Carry, in hopes it would cause the House to kill the bill by a point of order."nationalfile.com
From the story:
On Facebook, Rep. Matt Schaefer wrote, “No celebration yet folks! We are now reviewing amendments that were added by the Senate to look for issues that would break House rules governing the purpose of HB 1927. Our first impression has us very concerned. Will share more as soon as we can. Our goal is to make Texas the 21st Constitutional Carry state.”
Take from this what you will:
EXCLUSIVE: TX Gun Rights Says Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick Added 'Poison Pill' to Constitutional Carry Bill
"It looks like Patrick may have successfully placed a poison pill in an amendment to Constitutional Carry, in hopes it would cause the House to kill the bill by a point of order."nationalfile.com
From the story:
On Facebook, Rep. Matt Schaefer wrote, “No celebration yet folks! We are now reviewing amendments that were added by the Senate to look for issues that would break House rules governing the purpose of HB 1927. Our first impression has us very concerned. Will share more as soon as we can. Our goal is to make Texas the 21st Constitutional Carry state.”
I agree. I read the article, and also found it on another board (not this one) with comments. Everything I read did not point to any “poison pill” and all of the comments were asking the same thing… what is the article talking about? Form what I have read elsewhere, even with the amendments, both houses are ok with the wording.They keep saying that, but I don't see any amendment that would be a "poison pill". There were eight(8) adopted amendments and those were made by Schwertner, the bill's Senate sponsor.
You can look over all of the adopted amendments here. The added Senate amendments begin at F1 :
The "paid gun advocates " want more money, more clicks, more likes, more shares.I agree. I read the article, and also found it on another board (not this one) with comments. Everything I read did not point to any “poison pill” and all of the comments were asking the same thing… what is the article talking about? Form what I have read elsewhere, even with the amendments, both houses are ok with the wording.
i thought this was nothing more than someone trying to stir the pot, so I only posted this hoping someone knew more than me or could explain the hubbub.