Sorry.
I didn't have the sarcasm font on.
There SERIOUSLY needs to be such a thing !
Sorry.
I didn't have the sarcasm font on.
Nah, I laugh when I use sarcasm and I see some take me seriously, a font would take the fun out of it.There SERIOUSLY needs to be such a thing !
I find it hard to believe that just one officer was there. They should have dispatched every available officer and then call DPS for additional help. They should have arrested all the people in the front vehicles for obstructing traffic and towed them away.
Right now their just sticking their toe in the water to see if it gets bit. City officials had better crack down hard and fast to nip this sort of thing in the bud before they loose control
Yes Sir...... The fact the guy was pissed off about traffic being blocked is no defense to prosecution for assault.Agree it is not right, but I think the judge will have to try the case in front of him.
Let's see, it is illegal to take a cops pic but not to get in someone's face with your Iphone and post their pic on the web? Only cops can tell protesters to get out of the street and quit blocking traffic? Bunch of 'elitist' protesters think they have 'extra' rights and LE agrees? Big problem there. Bunch of women think they can protest and nobody will do anything, but the coward men are in the background, armed, just in case somebody does cause a problem? Yup normal modern society, make bad choices and 'require' somebody else take the consequence.
You can make bad choices but don't expect me to pay for them, I won't.
I went back and read the Breitbart article looking for a mention of traffic accident or high call volume but couldn’t find it. What you wrote earlier in response to another post you seem to have agreed with me and I quoteIf you read the article, you would have seen the reason for only dispatching one officer to the scene. It was reported and dispatched as vehicle accident, and they had a high volume of calls going with officers being elsewhere.