Target Sports

US Naval Surface Ops assessment

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • wiredgeorge

    Older than I was yesterday!
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 10, 2010
    1,592
    96
    Mico TX
    Ouch... with the Chinese ramping up, the USN trains on what?

    DK Firearms
     

    wakosama

    Collapse now - Avoid the rush
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 5, 2022
    11,166
    96
    Spring
    The USN disbanded its surface ship design NAVSEA group beginning 1/1/2000, and never reorganized it. Since then there have been essentially no new ship class designs. All 'new' vessels have simply been system upgrades, design repeats or completions of designs in progress at that time. US naval surface ship design essentially ended with the 'DDG-51' Arleigh Burke class destroyers. The ill fated Zumwalt 'cruiser' was a significantly under performing and over priced failure, acknowledget to be technologically out of date even as it was being built. All the current amphibs and carriers were under construction or in final design at that time. The 'new' Constellation class frigate is a European, designed by Fincantieri and put into service by the Italians and French over 15 years ago. This is all old news.

    Even at her age however, the Arleigh Burke is still the finest and most copied example of the surface combatant warship afloat.
     
    Last edited:

    General Zod

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 29, 2012
    22,881
    96
    Kaufman County
    The USN disbanded its surface ship design NAVSEA group beginning 1/1/2000, and never reorganized it. Since then there have been essentially no new ship class designs. All 'new' vessels have simply been system upgrades, design repeats or completions of designs in progress at that time. US naval surface ship design essentially ended with the 'DDG-51' Arleigh Burke class destroyers. The ill fated Zumwalt 'cruiser' was a significantly under performing and over priced failure, acknowledget to be technologically out of date even as it was being built. All the current amphibs and carriers were under construction or in final design at that time. The 'new' Constellation class frigate is a European, designed by Fincantieri and put into service by the Italians and French over 15 years ago. This is all old news.

    Even at her age however, the Arleigh Burke is still the finest and most copied example of the surface combatant warship afloat.

    Zumwalt could have been an effective ship class...if they hadn't canceled the only ammunition its deck gun was capable of firing...after the cost of the ammo went through the roof. It was innovative, and with the way new weapons systems go through a decade or more of development these days there's no way to keep them current with electronics and computer systems.

    Ford class carriers appear to be on their way to being effective, now that issues with the new electromagnetic catapults are being ironed out.
     

    Maxrobot

    Active Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 31, 2022
    265
    76
    Nashua, new Hampshire
    An important issue the article brings up is that after the fall of the Soviet Union, the Navy didn't think it had to worry about surface fighting anybody. Aviation and Subs got the funding and maintenance funds. and zero tolerance meant that any slip-up cost a man his career, so nobody wanted to admit there was a problem.
    Admin paperwork and attention to social issues that appeared in the news took the place of actual career development in warfare and the main job of the Navy - which is to find and sink enemy fleets..
    Now China and Iran are threats, but the USN is not ready for anything Navy-to Navy.
     

    Moonpie

    Omnipotent Potentate for hire.
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 100%
    20   0   0
    Oct 4, 2013
    23,091
    96
    Gunz are icky.
    (BB,s)? Broad butts....Big boobs....Buddies buddy....??

    The BB was a classification of large battleships such as the USS Missouri.
    Nothing else quite says I love you like 16inch diameter high explosive shells.
    Of course the Navy removed all of them from service many years ago because naval leadership is a bunch of girlymen.
     

    bigbigtex

    Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 16, 2013
    56
    11
    Cowtown
    How current is the info?

    I see that the publication date of the article is Sept 28, 2023, but I searched inside the article and the latest factual date mentioned is 2010 (listed twice).
     

    oldag

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Feb 19, 2015
    16,756
    96
    The BB was a classification of large battleships such as the USS Missouri.
    Nothing else quite says I love you like 16inch diameter high explosive shells.
    Of course the Navy removed all of them from service many years ago because naval leadership is a bunch of girlymen.
    I wonder how the armor on the old battleships would stand up to modern antiship missiles.
     
    Top Bottom