Since I voted for Stovall and yes on all 10 props. that would be a bit contradictory.
The primary is almost here, will you be voting against John Cornyn?
- Thread starter OFFascist
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
jordanmills
TGT Addict
Your title and poll question are opposites of each other.
I heard Brandon Batch speak and he certainly garnered my vote in this 11th district.
https://www.mrt.com/opinion/article/The-Second-Amendment-is-under-assault-14878179.php
https://www.mrt.com/opinion/article/The-Second-Amendment-is-under-assault-14878179.php
seeker_two
My posts don't count....
I voted for his opponent, Stovall, in the primary. If Cornyn wins, I'll vote for his opponent in the general election. Cornyn has done more damage than any freshman Dem could possibly accomplish. He has to go....
Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
I'll vote no on term limits. The voters should limit people, not a law. I know the average voter just votes for the name they recognize but I still don't like a law about it.
I'm surprised you're talking about polling, and not pulling.
Disagree for a number of reasons, but if the GOP loses the Senate, Schumer becomes majority leader and gets to control, among other things, judicial nominations. Which means in the best case scenario where Trump is reelected, his appointment of (ostensibly) conservative judges comes to a screeching halt and depending on what happens in the House, they may well start impeaching those who have already been confirmed.
You think it's rough now, let the judiciary stagnate for four years and then give a Dem the White House with a Dem Senate in 2024. And you don't even want to think about what would happen with Sanders as president with a Dem Senate. The constitution will be dead at that point.
Then the revolution will be alive!!!
Agreed. Personally, I wouldn’t take any action that would jeopardize Republican control of the Senate. Conservative approval of Trump’s federal judicial nominees is vital to the future of America. And as polarized as our political system is right now, you’re not likely to get judicial nominee support from a liberal Democrat senator. A candidate from a political Party that doesn’t support border security (among other Trump agenda items) isn’t acceptable to me, either. Cornyn would still be much more preferable than any Democrat candidate.
I won’t vote for the dem but I won’t vote for Cornyn either. Whatever libertarian is on the ballot will get my vote instead.
Hopefully Stovall pulls it off and Cornyn is irrelevant.
The last time I voted a democrat thinking that he couldn't be as bad as the republican, I kicked myself. Gary Locke turned out to be an Obama crony.
I always get a ‘kick’ out of this kind of “protest” voting philosophy in the General Election. And I’m not against “protest” voting (see below).
I voted for Stovall in the Primary but only as a “protest” vote since the likelihood of him beating Cornyn is minuscule. The idea was simply to ‘send a message’ to Cornyn - and we’re very unlikely to ever know how much or to what extent the voting results will influence Cornyn. With any luck, hopefully his ‘take away’ will be to be a little less RINO!
Why would he feel less inclined to RINO? He probably thinks, and apparently obviously so, that people will vote for him as the lesser of two evils. He has zero incentive to change if people vote that way.
