Tough crowd in here.Too bad only one taken down
I saw one of the first comments stating basically he would not have had to be a LTC holder. I guess because he was at his home.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
Oh.Article says the LTC holder was visiting the premises at which the incident occurred.
Good the LTC holder had not been drinking.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
Is it legal to ccw at a buddies without a ltc?Article says the LTC holder was visiting the premises at which the incident occurred.
And, is it legal to defend your life and property while you've been drinking, with or without an LTC?Is it legal to ccw at a buddies without a ltc?
Is it legal to ccw at a buddies without a ltc?
Generally noIs it legal to ccw at a buddies without a ltc?
Rhetorical, right?And, is it legal to defend your life and property while you've been drinking, with or without an LTC?
One outta three?
Fail.
It did not say that, but they did let him go. If they found him to have been drinking, I would think the story would have ended differently.Where did it say that?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It did not say that, but they did let him go. If they found him to have been drinking, I would think the story would have ended differently.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk