Texas AG: Stop Hating on Christmas

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    mbs05

    New Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 11, 2015
    4
    1
    Please explain to me how the first amendment disenfranchises a religious interest group and bans cultural traditions rooted in our Protestant heritage.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    It doesn't. The first amendment prohibits establishment of religion by the state. A lack of religious icons on government property doesn't interfere with the practice of your religious beliefs, or anyone else's. That's the point.

    Sent from my ONEPLUS A3000 using Tapatalk
     

    jeepinbanditrider

    Active Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 2, 2011
    842
    46
    Dallas
    It doesn't. The first amendment prohibits establishment of religion by the state. A lack of religious icons on government property doesn't interfere with the practice of your religious beliefs, or anyone else's. That's the point.

    Sent from my ONEPLUS A3000 using Tapatalk

    DingDingDingDingDing!
     

    stdreb27

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 12, 2011
    3,907
    46
    Corpus christi
    It doesn't. The first amendment prohibits establishment of religion by the state. A lack of religious icons on government property doesn't interfere with the practice of your religious beliefs, or anyone else's. That's the point.

    Sent from my ONEPLUS A3000 using Tapatalk

    The silencing of traditional Christmas imagery on state property is in fact establishing a religion and doing quite the opposite of what the first amendment intended.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     

    mbs05

    New Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 11, 2015
    4
    1
    The silencing of traditional Christmas imagery on state property is in fact establishing a religion and doing quite the opposite of what the first amendment intended.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    No, it really isn't.

    Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
     

    vmax

    TGT Addict
    TGT Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Apr 15, 2013
    17,301
    96
    Wait
    Did someone establish a state religion and church whist we were sleeping ?
     

    Mikewood

    Well-Known
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 8, 2011
    2,159
    66
    Houston
    Wait
    Did someone establish a state religion and church whist we were sleeping ?

    No, but they are trying to.
    We need to maintain and cultivate a government that is blind to religion. A place where the rights of all mankind are maintained. Where Jew, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist and Christian are treated the same. You can't do that if you only pray to Jesus or anyone else exclusively in our courts, schools and buildings.

    Perhaps this teacher can look past the fact her students are a different religion than she is but we have found out far too many times that often that doesn't happen. The only way to keep everyone equal is to not hold one god above another on government property.
     

    texas skeeter

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 50%
    1   1   0
    Mar 12, 2010
    7,694
    21
    Somewhere here nor there....
    I find it funny that only the Christian and Jewish type faiths being bashed and hated on these days by our Gvnmnt and media. And the Sheeple are going along with it...


    add- Are any of you here advocating against a school or courthouse putting up say a Christmas tree Religous type folks?
     
    Last edited:
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom