Question re "Infringe"

[BigRed]

Yes..endowed by the Creator, not the government.
1st part of the Declaration
A "natural" right

Absolutely!

 

[Sam7sf]

I will simply note the right to defense of one's life, liberty, and property is a right that precedes this state as well as any opinion, law, or position of this state ir any other.

This is the true answer.

Self preservation used in this sense with good judgment is at its core the correct answer. You owe no one an explanation.

 

[Sam7sf]

Yes..endowed by the Creator, not the government.
1st part of the Declaration
A "natural" right

This is what I don’t understand about people: even if you took god out of the equation, fundamentally nothing changes.

Yet people still believe you owe others an explanation to your self preservation.

Scientifically I would think it’s more overwhelming of a case why weapons are a necessity.

 

[Sam7sf]

It’s funny I posted that because there’s an answer. People only view the world from personal experience. Yes we have influence on others but if you ask a sheltered family living in a gated community with private level 3 security, their answers will greatly differ from those seeing drug dealers, rapist, car jackings, home invasions and corruption in le.

 

[vmax]

It’s funny I posted that because there’s an answer. People only view the world from personal experience. Yes we have influence on others but if you ask a sheltered family living in a gated community with private level 3 security, their answers will greatly differ from those seeing drug dealers, rapist, car jackings, home invasions and corruption in le.

Ted sums it up perfectly

 

[MountainGirl]

I’m not a lawyer either, and I tees that up. Using that page as a start, the Cornell LII does cover Miller as part of 2A Doctrine and Practice here:

Second Amendment: Doctrine and Practice

www.law.cornell.edu

Even citing Miller’s defense did noting in notation 4.

I dont know how I missed this post. Belated thank you very much.