Ding ding ding.Ejector rod is loose.
I always put loctite on all my revolver ejector rods. This happens quite often.
Its reverse threaded IIRC
Ding ding ding.Ejector rod is loose.
FIFYmid is retard slang for something that is mediocre and not really worth the cash or effort.
You know rugers are only that big and heavy because they're cast instead of forged right? Despite all that bulk, they're not really any stronger.if you ask me, newer smith revolvers are really mid, get a ruger tbh.
I know rugers are cast, but they are better than modern smiths by a large margin if you ask me.You know rugers are only that big and heavy because they're cast instead of forged right? Despite all that bulk, they're not really any stronger.
Maybe, my 686 is a dash 6 so old school and forged parts. I avoided the newer smith's due to the barrel sleeves, mim trigger and hammer, laser etched marks vs roll punched etc, but all that said, my gp100 is guilty of all those too. I prefer the full frame down the grip of a Smith vs Ruger that sits into a grip, but that's just an opinion. I'll choose forged over cast any day so I tend to prefer the Smith & Wesson. Just curious, why do you feel Ruger is supieor when it's fat and weighs more for the same strength forged offerings?I know rugers are cast, but they are better than modern smiths by a large margin if you ask me.
i have owened some smith and wesson revolvers from the 50's to the late 80's and Id say the quality then was very solid, after they started putting the Hillary hole into the sides of them is when their quality started taking a nose dive, I have also owned ruger revolvers from the same eras and have owned modern rugers, yes their revolvers are made out of hefty castings now but the quality and fit and finish from what I have observed is far better than modern smith and wessons. now a 1980's .357 K frame is far better than a modern GP100, but if I had to choose a modern wheel gun id go with the GP100. your mileage may vary of course.Maybe, my 686 is a dash 6 so old school and forged parts. I avoided the newer smith's due to the barrel sleeves, mim trigger and hammer, laser etched marks vs roll punched etc, but all that said, my gp100 is guilty of all those too. I prefer the full frame down the grip of a Smith vs Ruger that sits into a grip, but that's just an opinion. I'll choose forged over cast any day so I tend to prefer the Smith & Wesson. Just curious, why do you feel Ruger is supieor when it's fat and weighs more for the same strength forged offerings?
Hey Bill,I told him to check that and he said it made no difference.
Where do I live?Hey Bill,
If yinz lived a bit closer....have ya fixed up in a jiffy!
Later, Mark
It was a trick statement. He lives in Pennsylvania. So it doesn't matter where in texas you live.Where do I live?
Got it, thanks. I just assumed everyone here was from Texas, my bad.It was a trick statement. He lives in Pennsylvania. So it doesn't matter where in texas you live.
Hey Bill,Got it, thanks. I just assumed everyone here was from Texas, my bad.
220 swift.What round for grounghogs?