Texastransplant
Active Member
Imagine waking up at 2am and an intruder is in the house. You live in an area where homes are close, you have small children. You respond by grabbing your 870 28" full choke shotgun to confront the intruder. It's dark if you turn on the lights who knows what will happen, kids wake up, run out of the rooms, intruder has a weapon and fires.
Imagine the same scene at 2am, you wake up in your darkened home to the sound of an intruder and you have small children sleeping. You grab your 870, 20" barrel, extended mag, with a pistol grip and your 250 lumen flashlight on your bayonet attachment. You quietly walk the hall and down the stairs and are faced with a criminal raising a gun at you. Your light pops on blinding him and you get off the the first shot.
In the first one, you and your kids could be killed or even you may have shot one of your own. In the second the good guy wins, why? He has a firearm that allows him a slight advantage. If there were 2-3 intruders the 6-8 shots maybe needed.
Everything this adminstration does bypasses law, in some way circumvents it and does as they wish. How can you say restrictions are ok as it really won't do much. As I read the 2nd Amendment is says the right to bear arm shall not be infringed. Now they are going to limit what can be considered an arm? Yep in 1934 they did impose machine gun limitations, and in 1968 they copyied the restrictive "nazi" gun laws, yes Clinton installed the assualt weapon ban, that was repealed but I can tell you they aren't going to stop. This is just another toehold to takeing guns away.
Imagine the same scene at 2am, you wake up in your darkened home to the sound of an intruder and you have small children sleeping. You grab your 870, 20" barrel, extended mag, with a pistol grip and your 250 lumen flashlight on your bayonet attachment. You quietly walk the hall and down the stairs and are faced with a criminal raising a gun at you. Your light pops on blinding him and you get off the the first shot.
In the first one, you and your kids could be killed or even you may have shot one of your own. In the second the good guy wins, why? He has a firearm that allows him a slight advantage. If there were 2-3 intruders the 6-8 shots maybe needed.
Everything this adminstration does bypasses law, in some way circumvents it and does as they wish. How can you say restrictions are ok as it really won't do much. As I read the 2nd Amendment is says the right to bear arm shall not be infringed. Now they are going to limit what can be considered an arm? Yep in 1934 they did impose machine gun limitations, and in 1968 they copyied the restrictive "nazi" gun laws, yes Clinton installed the assualt weapon ban, that was repealed but I can tell you they aren't going to stop. This is just another toehold to takeing guns away.