Silly boy........That doesn’t look like a 1911
I like it. Have been trying to convince my wife she needs to replace her Glock 42 .380 with one.Way better. I held off getting a 365 but it is time my 320 gets a little brother.
No snag.Those sights are funky
Those sights are funky
They’re similar to the sights on a S&W 681/68-1. Takes little getting used to, but really no difference from some of the all black U-notch rear sights today.
What I like about them is the ease of front sight focus; what I dislike is accuracy suffers, but it does the job just fine for the intended purpose of putting a handful of rounds center mass.
I got the email from Sig this morning and looked up that sight. I assume from what you're saying, it would basically cover up what you're shooting at? I've had some pistol sights like that and never got comfortable with them.They’re similar to the sights on a S&W 681/68-1. Takes little getting used to, but really no difference from some of the all black U-notch rear sights today.
What I like about them is the ease of front sight focus; what I dislike is accuracy suffers, but it does the job just fine for the intended purpose of putting a handful of rounds center mass.
I got the email from Sig this morning and looked up that sight. I assume from what you're saying, it would basically cover up what you're shooting at? I've had some pistol sights like that and never got comfortable with them.
I think this is a variation of what used to be called a combat sight.
It’s not a bullseye or target site. It does take some getting used to, but can be just as accurate at close ranges as any other site. That is, for most use cases, the shooter is the limiting factor.
Which sig model is the little pocket 9mm (1911 like) with hammer and safety? Shot one, kinda neat and was accurate.