Maverick44
Youngest old man on TGT.
And Aaron, we may disagree on some of the finer points, but you do make some really good counter-points that I need to think over.
The plea bargaining is a very good counter-point you made. I'm not saying all plea bargaining should be abolished, but for some crimes, especially violent criminal acts, maybe plea bargaining isn't the best solution to the problem. I also think many prosecutors are just lazy, or care about racking up another one in their win column. IMO, that is entirely the wrong attitude for any prosecutor to take. They are suppose to be representing the community, and the victims.
Let me mull over some of the other points, and add to the discussion more later. Good post Aaron.
I can say the same for your points. This is far from a simple issue, and I doubt there's one perfect answer to it. It would likely require a series of compromises, and would still be far from perfect.
I do fully agree on the plea bargains. I see absolutely no reason why a rapist or a murder should be given anything less than the maximum possible sentence. Plea bargains should be reserved for less serious crimes that do not pose a significant risk to the general population. I would also like to see major changes to how prosecutors work. I find the idea that they can be even remotely influenced by politics or personal gain to be an affront to justice. We have seen time after time what happens when politics get involved in the pursuit of justice. It's never good.