AMAZING! California Handgun Roster Struck Down By Federal Court As Unconstitutional

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • toddnjoyce

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Sep 27, 2017
    The decision:
    The Second Amendment enshrines a fundamental constitutional right for law- abiding citizens to keep and bear arms for self-defense. Increasingly in modern times, with “the ubiquity of guns and our country’s high level of gun violence,” ordinary law- abiding people feel a need to possess handguns to protect themselves against violence. Bruen, 142 S. Ct. at 2158 (Alito, J., concurring). This may be because they “live in high- crime neighborhoods,” or because they “must traverse dark and dangerous streets in order to reach their homes after work or other evening activities,” or because they “reasonably believe that unless they can brandish or, if necessary, use a handgun in the case of attack, they may be murdered, raped, or suffer some other serious injury.” Id.
    Californians have the constitutional right to acquire and use state-of-the-art handguns to protect themselves. They should not be forced to settle for decade-old models of handguns to ensure that they remain safe inside or outside the home. But unfortunately, the UHA’s CLI, MDM, and microstamping requirements do exactly that. Because enforcing those requirements implicates the plain text of the Second Amendment, and the government fails to point to any well-established historical analogues that are consistent with them, those requirements are unconstitutional and their enforcement must be preliminarily enjoined. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction is GRANTED.
    DATED: March 20, 2023

    We shall see if the state appeals.

    General Zod

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 29, 2012
    Kaufman County
    Why would they need to appeal? They'll just ignore the decision and carry on with business as usual. That's becoming the leftist response to losing a Supreme Court decision...especially where the Second Amendment is concerned.
    Top Bottom