A new offering from S & W

[Byrd666]

Video about the new S & W CSX 9

 

[Sam7sf]

New to sw not to anyone else but I like it. If it’s cheaper than a sig I’d try one.

 

[Moonpie]

Still waiting on the M&P 10mm.

 

[Byrd666]

New to sw not to anyone else but I like it. If it’s cheaper than a sig I’d try one.

Price tag from another video I saw showed it at 599.xx

I kinda like them myself. Doesn't do me any good, as field strip is similar to a 1911, but I still like ém.

 

[no2gates]

A little late to the game, but it will be interesting to see reviews of how it stacks up to the P365 and Hellcat.

 

[seeker_two]

I wonder about magazine compatibility. It doesn't look like Shield Plus mags work....M&P Compact mags maybe? If they go with proprietary magazines, that may be a deal breaker.

 

[Sasquatch]

This looks like a cool gun. I hope they're not plagued by recalls or spotty reliability. I'd love to see one a bit larger, with a rail and an optics cut. A 3.8 to 4 inch barrel version, 13-15 round magazines. As seeker_two said, hopefully these are using M&P magazines.

 

[SQLGeek]

I'm not sure what to think about that to be honest. Interesting though. Maybe there's hope for a new generation of their DA/SA guns yet...

 

[Grumps21]

Dunno, maybe I’m just getting old, but so far nothing new interests me. Everything on my bucket list is at least 30 years old. Exception: possibly a Ruger .44 mag red hawk

 

[GasGuzzler]

I still have a Shield 9 so...

 

[striker55]

I wonder about magazine compatibility. It doesn't look like Shield Plus mags work....M&P Compact mags maybe? If they go with proprietary magazines, that may be a deal breaker.

I had problems with Shield 45 mags until I stripped them down, cleaned them with Remington Rem Oil. The oil has Teflon in it, leaves a coating of Teflon. I'm not saying oiling the mags, clean them and push a rag through and wipe the follower top. No more miss feed's. Weird setup removing the springs.

 

[Grumps21]

Dunno, maybe I’m just getting old, but so far nothing new interests me. Everything on my bucket list is at least 30 years old. Exception: possibly a Ruger .44 mag red hawk

...oh and possibly a SW 1911. I believe it’s a series 80, but I’ve read good things about it.

 

[Grumps21]

I still have a Shield 9 so...

Shields are solid pistols. I had a shield 2.0 9mm, and really I liked it. Was my first auto Probably shouldn’t have gotten rid of it, but I can only carry one at a time, and I was partial to the LC9 because it doesn’t print as much being concealed.

 

[gll]

This looks to me like a good candidate to become the basis for a 4th Gen S&W series...

 

[Brains]

I still daily my OG Shield in .40 but this looks interesting.

 

[Mowingmaniac 24/7]

Ultimately, I didn't care for the Ruger LC9S or the S&W 9mm EZ - gave em both away to family members.

 

[BeatTheTunaUp]

I like it, but honestly, aside from the 2 extra rnds. There's not much difference between the csx and a $250 Star BM9 I picked up last month. Both 1911ish, 9mm, metal frame, similar trigger/safety. It has ambi controls and better sights. meh

 

[m5215]

If S&W ever jumps back into all-metal autoloaders in DA/SA then I might grab one or two but I will have to pass on this one.

 

[PinnedandRecessed]

No mention of the CSX on Smith and Wesson's website. Looks like someone leaked early and others piled on that already had a sample. Link below not intended to turn thread into a public forum of those that do or do not like Nutnfancy.

 

[PinnedandRecessed]

I applaud the aluminum frame but have to admit this is not the best looking pistol....especially with that janky looking trigger. Some talon grips would help out the smooth frame but not too sure I would jump this offering with everything else out there. Also don't know why Smith left out the dust cover rail. Probably will be added to the Gen 2. It's annoying that manufacturers drop these models sans standard features and then drop the PLUS model shortly after the first wave of buyers already have one.