Join TexasGunTalk

A "Balanced Supreme Court" ?

Discussion in 'Gun Legislation' started by leVieux, Jan 12, 2019.

  1. leVieux

    leVieux Old Guy "Have Gun; Won't Travel !"

    523
    223
    43
    Mar 28, 2013
    Saint Martinville, LA
    "BALANCED" Supreme Court ?
    NO!
    Don't let them sell you this seditious idea. Our media & our left have used this to confer "reasonableness" as a Court goal.
    Dear Hearts, our Supreme Court is the FINAL arbitrator of what our government is allowed to do under our U S Constitution !
    The ideal of the Court is to limit our government to what our Constitution permits it to do.
    When the issue is constitutionality, there is NO room for the Justices' personal "political positions", despite that notion having been sold to us.
    Just consider for a moment the phrase "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"; then consider the patchwork of contrary laws which has been allowed by the Court(s).
    Under our system, we have clear methods of changing our Constitution and "Court Nullification" is NOT one of them !
    There is little factual room for "liberal" Justices (or, for Conservative Justices) to alter our Constitutional protections to fit their whims, as has been done !
    A "TYRANNY IN BLACK ROBES" is the worst kind of tyranny, as there is no further appeal from it!
    Indeed, this is a main reason that our Founders gave us a strong Second Amendment.
    Please THINK !
    Rick
     


    Sam7sf and motorcarman like this.
  2. oldag

    oldag TGT Addict

    4,054
    1,727
    113
    Feb 19, 2015
    The liberals want balanced first, so they can close the gap. Then they will forget all about balance and go for a strong majority, hypocrites that they are...
     
  3. Vaquero

    Vaquero Pre-ban Staff Member Admin

    30,633
    5,311
    113
    Apr 4, 2011
    Out West
    When they win "that's the law" "those are the rules"

    When they lose "we need to do away with electoral college "
    "Supreme court has too much power"
     
    ekim, Sandoval and toddnjoyce like this.
  4. Moonpie

    Moonpie TGT Addict Lifetime Member

    “ Balanced” to Libtards is when everyone thinks like they do.
     
  5. SQLGeek

    SQLGeek Mildly Proficient at 3 Yards TGT Supporter

    1,538
    1,547
    113
    Sep 22, 2017
    Richmond
    When Democrats win: "Elections have consequences."

    When Democrats lose: "We need compromise!"

    Spineless Republicans in both cases: "OK!"
     
    CyberWolf, ekim, Sam7sf and 2 others like this.
  6. easy rider

    easy rider Allotropic Transformer TGT Supporter

    15,844
    7,273
    113
    Jun 10, 2015
    Odessa, Tx
    Supreme court judges shouldn't be driven by politics, personal feelings or what is believed to be the good of the people. They should be there to interpret the constitutionality of the law as it is written.
     
    CyberWolf, leVieux, ekim and 5 others like this.
  7. jrbfishn

    jrbfishn TGT Addict

    19,233
    1,403
    113
    Aug 9, 2013
    south of killeen
    Exactly

    Sent by an idjit coffeeholic from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
     
  8. diesel1959

    diesel1959 por vida Lifetime Member

    2,769
    1,588
    113
    Nov 7, 2013
    Houston & BFE
    Originalism & Textualism are neither conservative nor liberal. Neither left nor right. They are simply fidelity to founding documents and a matter of keeping the fed.gov within its metes and bounds.
     
    SQLGeek, Big Green and oldag like this.
  9. leVieux

    leVieux Old Guy "Have Gun; Won't Travel !"

    523
    223
    43
    Mar 28, 2013
    Saint Martinville, LA
    EXACTLY !

    leVieux
     

Share This Page