A "Balanced Supreme Court" ?

[leVieux]

"BALANCED" Supreme Court ?
NO!
Don't let them sell you this seditious idea. Our media & our left have used this to confer "reasonableness" as a Court goal.
Dear Hearts, our Supreme Court is the FINAL arbitrator of what our government is allowed to do under our U S Constitution !
The ideal of the Court is to limit our government to what our Constitution permits it to do.
When the issue is constitutionality, there is NO room for the Justices' personal "political positions", despite that notion having been sold to us.
Just consider for a moment the phrase "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"; then consider the patchwork of contrary laws which has been allowed by the Court(s).
Under our system, we have clear methods of changing our Constitution and "Court Nullification" is NOT one of them !
There is little factual room for "liberal" Justices (or, for Conservative Justices) to alter our Constitutional protections to fit their whims, as has been done !
A "TYRANNY IN BLACK ROBES" is the worst kind of tyranny, as there is no further appeal from it!
Indeed, this is a main reason that our Founders gave us a strong Second Amendment.
Please THINK !
Rick

 

[oldag]

The liberals want balanced first, so they can close the gap. Then they will forget all about balance and go for a strong majority, hypocrites that they are...

 

[Vaquero]

When they win "that's the law" "those are the rules"

When they lose "we need to do away with electoral college "
"Supreme court has too much power"

 

[Moonpie]

“ Balanced” to Libtards is when everyone thinks like they do.

 

[SQLGeek]

When Democrats win: "Elections have consequences."

When Democrats lose: "We need compromise!"

Spineless Republicans in both cases: "OK!"

 

[easy rider]

Supreme court judges shouldn't be driven by politics, personal feelings or what is believed to be the good of the people. They should be there to interpret the constitutionality of the law as it is written.

 

[jrbfishn]

Supreme court judges shouldn't be driven by politics, personal feelings or what is believed to be the good of the people. They should be there to interpret the constitutionality of the law as it is written.

Exactly

Sent by an idjit coffeeholic from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

 

[diesel1959]

Originalism & Textualism are neither conservative nor liberal. Neither left nor right. They are simply fidelity to founding documents and a matter of keeping the fed.gov within its metes and bounds.

 

[leVieux]

Supreme court judges shouldn't be driven by politics, personal feelings or what is believed to be the good of the people. They should be there to interpret the constitutionality of the law as it is written.

EXACTLY !

leVieux